looking up to joseph - dec 18 2014
There
are two versions of what happened during the months and days preceding the
birth of the Lord on that first Christmas - the version of Matthew and the
version of Luke. Both may be telling the
same story externally but there exist a difference. The version of Luke it would seem came from
the perspective of Mary – it narrated what happened to her, her encounter with
the angel, her inner thoughts and feelings, her confusion, and eventually her agreement
and surrender. The other version, the
version of Matthew it would seem came from the perspective of Joseph, it
narrated what happened to him, it gave the reader a look into what went through
his mind and heart, how it disturbed and confused him, it narrated his
feelings, and we even came to know of his dreams and eventually his
obedience. Since our gospel comes from
Matthew then I would like to discover and dig further into this latter
perspective, the perspective of Joseph.
How did Joseph experience this whole affair?
Remember
this is important – Matthew’s version is important. This perspective of Joseph, how he managed
the events that happened in the infancy of Jesus from the time he came to know
of Mary’s pregnancy to the confusion that would have led him to divorce her, to
how he laid down his cards when the angel in a dream assured him that this was
of the Holy Spirit. It is important to
digest as it were, how Joseph managed the birth of his Son in Bethlehem triggered
by the political situation of his time and this with no place to lay their
heads. It is revealing of the person how
he managed the flight to Egypt in an effort to escape a tyrant who was out to
kill his son, or the return from Egypt to Nazareth to start a new life. These considerations are important because they
reveal the attitude of Joseph, his character, his way of loving and caring which
he as a father would one day communicate to his son Jesus.
Where
do you think Jesus got the idea that a father always gives good gifts to his
children? Where, do you imagine, did Jesuse get the image of the father
running to welcome home his prodigal son? Where do you think the
tenderness in his voice came from, when he said we were to address God as
'abba' or 'daddy', papa, tay. That is
why it is important to look into how Joseph managed the whole affair because
that was how he was as a father to Jesus, and it is this way of fathering, it
is this experience he had with his father Joseph which Jesus will one day tell
us about when he refers to and talks about God.
Remember
that time in the past when your name is Jose and you are nicknamed Pepe? That was before the Americans came when Jose all
of a sudden became Joe. But why Pepe? Because of Joseph – Pe Pe – double P - Padre
Putativo – the reputed father, not the real one but someone regarded as the
father. And yet he was told by the angel
in the same dream to give the child the name Jesus. Although he was not the real father, he was
to be his name-giver. The person who
gives the name in Jewish culture puts that person under him – he was in-charge,
he was, mentor, the first and foremost formator of the child, he was therefore
father even if this is not biological.
And yet, despite this role, in all his appearances in the bible, rare as
they were, Joseph said nothing, absolutely nothing. And
yet consider the richness, the eloquence, the profundity and depth of what he
communicated to Jesus. Where do you think Jesus got the idea that a father can
never, never hand his son a scorpion if he asks for a bread, or a snake if he
asks for a fish. A father cannot do that,
Jesus said. And where did he get that
idea? Joseph. From his Pepe - Joseph.
Jews
in the time of Jesus were patriarchal.
It means that it was the male sex, the father who dominated family
life. And yet strangely the roles seemed
to be reversed in Matthew. In Jewish
families the wives serve the needs of the husband. In Matthew the opposite became true. It was the needs of his wife Mary and the
needs of his child Jesus which would dictate his life and even his
location. He had to adjust to their
needs and not they to his. He stood by
them despite his initial doubts about his marriage, despite the many unanswered
questions in his mind. He had to swallow
his pride accepting the child as his own and contented himself simply as the
name-giver, and yet he had to assume responsibility for the life of the child
at such a cost to his reputation, to his convenience, and even to his profession
and means of livelihood. And then like a
traditional Jewish wife, Joseph would fade away and he would be hidden from
view, never to be heard of again. This
strange silence of Joseph is shouting something. This silence is deafening. What is the purpose of this silence? I do not know. But this I know, some of the best teachings
of Jesus were formed about, by his experience of an earthly father.
Today
is family day. Today we read the birth
of Jesus from the point of view of Joseph, from the point of view of a
father. For this I would like to appeal
to the fathers here present. It is
absolutely necessary to give your children the experience of a good father. It is I said absolutely necessary. When you accepted your wife you also accepted
fatherhood and for that you know very well that your life from that time on
will be determined by the needs of your family.
Many a children’s lives are shattered because it is they who are made to
adjust to the needs of their parents rather than a parent adjust to the needs
of their children? It is the children
who are made to go through the confusion, it is they who are made to carry the
greater burden. In my many years now
forming young people I have seen an increasing trend into this direction. In any conflict it is the children who always
get to carry the greater burden.
This
is probably the reason for the silence of Joseph and his fading away. It is to
emphasize your role. We have gone past
the need to be attended to. We cannot
forever take center stage. Learn from
Joseph, fade away, this is no longer about you.
Be a good father.
Comments